THE LA TIMES RESPONDS TO BLOG CRITIQUES

I think I may have mentioned that our old friend Patterico was right steamed when the LA Times (and on the front page too) was just flat wrong about Amb. Bremer's departure from Iraq. This was not a subtle matter of interpretation, either: the Times made snide note of Bremer's departing without a farewell address, while meanwhile Zeyad was posting about the moving power of his emotional farewell address.

Well, meanwhile, back at the ranch, Jason Van Steenwyk was even less impressed and more steamed with the Times, whose article he believed to be out and out editorializing on the front page. And, as he notes, now that their editor has come out with that well covered "psuedojournalist" crack about Fox, they're pretty much living in a big ole glass house.

Well now the reporter in question has responded to Jason's, er, issues -- and I do believe he's more steamed than before.

Comments

[blort the Blogger]

I just need a place to say this, even though I bet it's been said before,

where are all the non-militant Muslums? Any Muslum that does not agree that hostage taking and killing are morally correct should act upon their fellow brothers and sisters to stop this beligerent attitude on human life!

Inaction is the same as agreeing to whats going on. The muslum religion really needs to rethink how they want to intergrate into humanity, and stop trying to force humanity into beleiving in their way of death.

There is room for all religions and non-beleivers alike, and if they don't like that, then they can leave, period. All of them.